[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why are 1024 bit keys the limit right now?

To: Derek Atkins <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Why are 1024 bit keys the limit right now?
From: Jason Burrell <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 23:34:28 -0600 (CST)
cc: "Mark M." <[email protected]>, "James A. Tunnicliffe" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On 8 Jan 1997, Derek Atkins wrote:

> There is no PGP 2.6.3; at least not that came from MIT... Someone
> else may have made something claiming to be 2.6.3, but it did not
> originate from MIT.

There is a pgp 2.6.3i. Apparently, it's another "international" version. I
believe it's on one of the usual sites, but I don't know what's changed in
it.

--
Good government. Good government. Sit. Stay.

References:
- Re: Why are 1024 bit keys the limit right now?
  - From: Derek Atkins <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: IMPORTANT: Additional information about UDCM.
Next by Date: Re: SSL Insecurity
Prev by thread: Re: Why are 1024 bit keys the limit right now?
Next by thread: Re: Why are 1024 bit keys the limit right now?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread