Re: A vote of confidence for Sandy

[Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

For example, I think this message could have been worded in such a way that
it was on-topic. Dale really had to exert himself to make this a pure flame.
When he doesn't put so much effort into it, he's worth reading.

See also http://minerva.fileita.it/webitalia/netscum/gravesr0.html

- -rich

On Sat, 11 Jan 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:

> Rich Graves wrote:
> [snip]
> > I'd just like to say that as disgusting as I find most of Dale's posts,
> > I consider almost all of them appropriate for the list.
> > While I'd classify Dale's posts as among "worst of cypherpunks,"
> > IMO they are all at least *of* cypherpunks.
> 
> Rich, you have to have a mind to comment on my posts.  To call my
> posts disgusting, when I as a person am  1) Vastly more concerned
> about justice, truth, and openness than you, and  2) Vastly more
> intelligent than you, is pure ignorance and hypocrisy.
> 
> When you have nothing to say, you do the "attack against the man",
> which is a logical fallacy.  You and Sandfort can lie in bed together
> on that one.  Punk.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQBVAwUBMtgFrZNcNyVVy0jxAQHipAH/WS2VkTlWbf3ttMBUcq1sRXY1sJbNWJ5G
aR6T6ZWD0iJQVKD5X8/9QPUBl2MUdml3xS1f5MH+pynY63OEfPTg0Q==
=7+Je
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----