Re: Monitoring the monitors [Was: Gilmore and Sandfart suck big dicks]

[aga <aga@dhp.com>]

On Sat, 18 Jan 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:

> Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> > Someone wrote to me:
> > >Did you not mean any homo who has ever shaffted Gilmore and Sandy can
> > >write what the fuck they like but straight or intelligent or NORMAL
> > >people will have to be filtered.
> 
> > Yes, that's precisely how Sandfart's moderation will work. Homosexuals
> > like Jason Durbin will continue to post personal attacks on Gilmore's
> > many "enemies", but the victims of the libel will not be able to respond
> > and refute their lies. The concept of "the best response to speech you
> > don't like is more speech" is totally alien to the homosexual subculture
> > on the Internet. These control freaks are into censorship and B&D.
> 
> Here's a problem.  I don't have "technical" capabilities in the area of
> communications software, and I have too full a plate to start studying
> now.  But, I/we need to monitor the "moderator", to make sure he doesn't
> allow people to attack others, then cut the responses.
> 
> If he does this, and he doesn't rectify it when it's called to his
> attention, he would need to be punished in some way.  One of the
> questions I have is, how do I know what's cut when all I subscribe to
> is the uncensored list?  I do *not* want to subscribe to the filtered
> list plus the "flames" list, out of principle.  Is this something that
> would be forced on me/us in order to monitor the censorship?
> 
> In other words, can I separate the censored email without having to
> have two accounts?
> 
> 

You can not.  You need another account.

I wrote to Steve Case about this censorship problem, and I am waiting
for him to respond.

Do you want another account to get the censored list at?