[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moderation, Tim, Sandy, me, etc. * Strong crypto == DES?!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Barber <[email protected]> writes:
John> Tim, the Cypherpunks have chosen to follow Sandy's lead for this
John> month. I'll admit I made it easy for them, but the results are
John> conclusive. There are 1311 addresses in the cypherpunks list
John> today; 42 in the unedited list; and 19 in the flames list.
Jeff> "Conclusively" this has shown only that most folks are willing
Jeff> to go along with an experiment -- especially if it requires them
Jeff> to do exactly nothing.
This is precisely the category into which I fall. It is a pain to
unsubscribe from a list, since my "From_" header doesn't agree with my
"From:" header (the former has a specific host included, the latter
only a zone), and this often triggers a message to the list owner for
processing.
In any case, I am willing to go along with the experiment. But a
NoCeM-style approach to killing the noise is much more preferable.
Failing that, an individual filter (such as procmail) is good. In any
event, the responsibility of what to post and what to read should be
in the hands of each reder individually.
- --
Matt Curtin Chief Scientist Megasoft, Inc. [email protected]
http://www.research.megasoft.com/people/cmcurtin/ I speak only for myself
Hacker Security Firewall Crypto PGP Privacy Unix Perl Java Internet Intranet
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Have you encrypted your data today?
iQEVAwUBMvtGmH6R34u/f3zNAQFQbwf9HYoT51vkHSjSJOnzXcphD7WLoOEq8WV1
rj33PUweZiibTyZg1JADdbS09QVgl80TE90YDJGQ/c77wwBuMKiJTVAz8jaixjCK
kUJ6IiQ4Ul3Q1LfyM5iC/kphQc/ILld0PHpaZl104pLoJ13rK6FCzMaQd+MZpWoJ
ZLWxrKaebFF5IH0dW9avJ3Vb5Kp+6OSGmpBwooFiq+nhuUCaeAZtOAwmutDM5d1g
oDTXGmdFuDLzjAuLcQnNAwc/nRd0bBLj3b3KFYkOzNjnl3BjOw3s4XVMF4sELOCX
aOnxZE/u7lP3HkAQtJ+PxHgthUbODE0ixDU0iuWSrDVm8gRAe4Xm0A==
=78/T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----