[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
faulty moderation software: duplicate messages
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Virtually all list postings to the cypherpunks main list are
doubled; the first, which is a standard pass through with the
message ID of the sender, the second with the message ID of
toad.com.
Obviously, the first is destined for the unedited list --which did
_not_ receive the message. The second has been re-IDd, which I
presume is your censorhip mark.
I happen to subscribe to all three lists, even though
main + flames == unedited
is supposedly the intention, it is not. In order to divide the
output stream from toad.com, sorting on "Sender: " is the only
reasonable differentation (when toad's filters are working):
Sender: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
in the case cited below, the only differentation between the
destinations is that the censored message has a "Message-ID: "
from toad.com, while the one intended for unedited has a
"Message-ID: " not from toad.com. was either of these
destinated from flames? --the main list with duplicated messages
has contained any number of messages, including ones from the
ASCII art series which should have gone to flames.
so, why is the pass through message not being reliably re-headered
at toad.com to mark "Sender: [email protected]"
--but if it is, why is unedited receiving a duplicate --obviously
the duplicate should have gone to flames.
BOTTOM LINE: your software is inadequate. my neighbors' kids write
better filters than you have installed.
+Received: from toad.com (toad.com [140.174.2.1])
+ by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA05103
+ for <[email protected]>; Fri, 7 Feb 1997 04:24:48 -0700 (MST)
+Received: (from majordom@localhost) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
+DAA20391; Fri, 7 Feb 1997 03:21:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from
+hermes.ex.ac.uk (hermes.ex.ac.uk [194.83.11.25]) by toad.com
+(8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA20386; Fri, 7 Feb 1997 03:21:20 -0800
+(PST) Received: from [email protected] [194.168.60.88]
+by hermes via ESMTP (LAA22615); Fri, 7 Feb 1997 11:21:06 GMT Received:
+(from aba@localhost) by server.test.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA00460;
+Fri, 7 Feb 1997 11:15:30 GMT Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 11:15:30 GMT
+Message-Id: <[email protected]>
+From: Adam Back <[email protected]>
+To: [email protected]
+Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
+In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (message from Mark
+ Voorhees on Wed, 05 Feb 97 17:05:51 -0400)
+Subject: Re: Deloitte-Touche?
+Sender: [email protected]
+Precedence: bulk
+X-UIDL: 5456a9a45ccaf4617ae176a63b26efb4
+Received: from toad.com (toad.com [140.174.2.1])
+ by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA26045;
+ Fri, 7 Feb 1997 09:00:01 -0700 (MST)
+Received: (from majordom@localhost) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id
+HAA24892; Fri, 7 Feb 1997 07:12:54 -0800 (PST) Message-Id:
+ <[email protected]>
+Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 11:15:30 GMT
+From: Adam Back <[email protected]>
+To: [email protected]
+Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
+Subject: Re: Deloitte-Touche?
+Sender: [email protected]
+Precedence: bulk
+X-UIDL: 83079c59aea2b28dc5ded2dc73c5219a
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: latin1
Comment: No safety this side of the grave. Never was; never will be
iQCVAwUBMvtvF704kQrCC2kFAQEFAwP/RyyZswe9GznJt4TAEMPnhKcgA9pUsf+k
mw+pDcjaJyUfKttoaVz0qRM2hIe33igoPtBDXWf5VD9r+Gz+gry6K+UK7rYCNNE9
MMdYHRV51hYuLKJAY4LNU6j5hoqf5q2Btt/m3F9SFQtD0ellsi4QH/vseJC1YNYh
tq3TA+hny/U=
=v3sl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----