Re: Fuck UseNet

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

Toto allegedly said:
> 
> Jeremiah A Blatz wrote:
> > alt.cypherpunks has been newgroup'ed, and I belive rm'grouped. Smart,
> > consiencous newsadmins probably did not honor the rmgroup, as
> > alt.cypherpunks should be acceptable, but most newsadmins are too
> > overworked to actually look at most of the crap that comes through.
> 
> > Therefore, it would be a Good Thing to continue any discussion on
> > alt.config, and convince any cabal'ers who rmgroup it to re-new it.
> > Sending out boosters every couple of weeks wouldn't hurt, either.
> 
>   So, basically, you're saying that the flight from censorship should
> be toward a new CypherPunk 'home' where one is effectively censored
> automatically unless one kisses the ass of a Cabal?

Pretty much, yes.  The voting process for a comp group is better, IMO.

But the distributed mailing list is by far the most interesting 
solution.  Contrary to what some have claimed, it really isn't the 
same as usenet -- it allows for distributed control.  There is no 
doubt that the operator of a mail list host should have the freedom 
to set his or her policies as they see fit -- it is their machine, 
and their responsibility.  And contrariwise, subscribers should have 
the freedom to chose list hosts with compatible philosophies.


-- 
Kent Crispin				"No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com,kc@llnl.gov		the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint:   5A 16 DA 04 31 33 40 1E  87 DA 29 02 97 A3 46 2F