[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NETLINK_IPSEC

To: Alan Olsen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: NETLINK_IPSEC
From: Bryce <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 23:31:34 +0100
cc: Jeremey Barrett <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 08 Feb 1997 08:44:58 PST." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> Has anyone tried IPSEC with the 2.1.x kernels?  Are there a logcation that
> describes the differences between 2.0.x and 2.1.x?  (I have not been able to
> find one...)  Then again, I have yet to find a list of what was fixed from
> kernel to kernel...  (Probibly in some directory of the tar file...)


Source 1:  ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/kcs

Source 2:  The patch files.  :-)


Regards,

Bryce, not a kernel hacker

PGP sig follows



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
Comment: Auto-signed under Unix with 'BAP' Easy-PGP v1.1b2

iQB1AwUBMwDzRUjbHy8sKZitAQE5OQL/X/Uv6oIJTQqWsVzRVTF8slnMBZa9sByj
ld4mHGvfn7lwQXmdWk7OOngRWum38ZysjRxRk7R5OtULhRsUxRjIe2FhTXFn3v/O
nKxHOTmbbwvz/flovkg7cUFeIk/7iCEl
=ucy1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: NETLINK_IPSEC
  - From: Alan Olsen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Moderation experiment almost over; "put up or shut up"
Next by Date: alt.cypherpunks
Prev by thread: Re: NETLINK_IPSEC
Next by thread: Re: NETLINK_IPSEC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread