Re: 40-bit RC5 crack meaningless??

[ca3sal@isis.sunderland.ac.uk (Stephen.George.Allport)]

Strassmann wrote:
>In summary: The claim of exportable cryptography being totally
>insecure, because it can be cracked in 3.5 hours is not
>realistic. The three clues announced in the contest
>would not apply  under infowar conditions.

As the UK gets a lot of desktop PC software from the US, ie MS & Lotus
we unfouantly have to live with the 40-bit limit. What the RSA Chalange and 
Ian Goldberg have achived is a couple of aritcales in the broad sheet papers

http://www.telegraph.co.uk:80/et?ac=000145546611023&rtmo=33032622&atmo=33032622&;
P4_FOLLOW_ON=/97/2/4/ecfilm04.html&pg=/et/97/2/4/ecfilm04.html

(ouch) and

http://go2.guardian.co.uk/archive.html

The competion has shown to the general populs and not just "experts" what a 
crap deal were getting. Three and half hours gets people thinking.

Ste