[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cypherpunks FAQ
On Mon, 17 Feb 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:
> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 17:12:19 -0800
> From: Dale Thorn <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Cypherpunks FAQ
>
> Toto wrote:
> > ISP_Ratings wrote:
> > > Yes--and given the role Dr. Vulis has played in this matter
> > > it would be most appropriate for him to write an FAQ (although
> > > I personally ignore most FAQs).
>
> >Perhaps it would be more appropriate for the good doctor to write a FUQs.
>
> Why not do it like the Declaration of Independence? A primary author
> puts the basic document together, and other persons with expertise in
> other important areas add to it, then it gets circulated on the list
> for comments and suggestions.
>
> "Other areas" not normally addressed in these kinds of documents
> should include subscribers' awareness that the crypto lists are
> a prime target of attention from federal agencies, et al, and
> that much of the material posted could be pure disinformation.
>
I do not think that any Federal Agency would be interested in any
group so undisciplined as cypherpunks.