[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: alt.cypherpunks.ebonics

To: [email protected] (jim bell)
Subject: Re: alt.cypherpunks.ebonics
From: snow <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 01:57:47 -0600 (CST)
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "jim bell" at Feb 18, 97 07:35:16 pm
Sender: [email protected]

Mr. Bell wrote:
> At 11:16 AM 2/18/97 -0500, Alec wrote:
> >With the exceptions of AP (oh so clearly way off-topic),
> Quite to the contrary, AP is NOT "oh so clearly way off-topic."   First AP, 
> as I've sketched it uses many of the 
> encryption/digital-signature/verification techniques which are often 
> discussed here and are essentially universally agreed as being on-topic.  

	Uhhh.... Jim?

	I think that Alec and friend were tweaking Igor. Think Sarcasm.

	Then again I could be wrong. I was once.

References:
- Re: alt.cypherpunks.ebonics
  - From: jim bell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Cypherpunks Mailing List (Was: Re: When and where?)
Next by Date: Still no sign of alt.cypherpunks heirarchy at Netcom
Prev by thread: Re: alt.cypherpunks.ebonics
Next by thread: Re: alt.cypherpunks.ebonics
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread