Re: "cypherpunks is dead..."

[snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>]

> At 3:37 PM -0500 2/19/97, Robert Hettinga wrote:
> is stil bogged down, for reasons I have to believe have to do with
> pressures from somewhere, else why would e-mail packages not make PGP
> support painless?)

	There are several packages that do provide at least some level 
of PGP integration, but I have 2 very good reasons:

	1) The "market place" isn't willing to pay for the additional work.

	2) It isn't "sexy" enough to cause a programmer to want to add it 
to a mailer just for fun.