[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Creating a unique ID number for a dollar
On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Tim May wrote:
> At 5:25 PM -0700 6/1/97, William H. Geiger III wrote:
> >stored on individules a SS number is quite convienat as everyone has a
> >unique one. Most employee, payroll, medical, insurance, credit, databases
Somebody here is forgetting that the Social Security
Adminstration, back in the mid-eighties claimed that at least
10 percent of the numbers in use, were improperly issued.
The same number was issued to _two or *more*_ people. The worst
case was a number that several thousand people used, thinking it
was issued to them, exclusively, when it was in fact never issued.
A further complication is that the same individual could have been
issued two or _more_ different numbers, either by design, or
accident.
> >unique qualities that make it perfect for this use: 1 every person has a
> >unique #, and 2 it never changes. This can not be said for any other
Both premises are false, and the SSA has said so on several
different occasions.
> without entry of any allegedly random numbers, and without any hashing
> of personal data. It's not necessarily a real short number, certainly
> not as short as an SS number.
One proposal I'm familiar with was:
date of birth << year month day >>
time of birth << hours, minutes, seconds >>
longitude of birth << degrees, minutes, seconds >>
lattitude of birth << degrees, minutes, seconds >>
sex << one letter >>
mother's initials << first, middle, last >>
father's initials << first, middle, last >>
so you'd end up with something like
19970601185500-0300000.00-300000.00mxyzwvz
<< A number which would be issued to a male born today
somewhere slightly north of Port Shepstone, and slightly west
of Pietermaritzburg, RSA. >>
However, there are several problems with it, the two most notable
being the lack of accurate birth times, and that most people have
a very hard time remembering 42 digit numbers.
I don't know how solvable those, and other not so apparant
problems are, but I suspect that it has been intensively
studied by more than a few governments and organizations, since
it was first proposed, fifty something years ago.
xan
jonathon
[email protected]
Monolingualism is a curable disease