[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Who "invented" remailers?

To: Tim May <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Who "invented" remailers?
From: Lucky Green <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 1997 01:06:25 -0700
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <v0310280cafba70127c0a@[207.167.93.63]>
References: <[email protected]><v03102807afba566172be@[207.167.93.63]>
Sender: [email protected]

At 06:27 PM 6/3/97 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>(There are important issues, discussed by several of us several years ago,
>and more recently by Wei Dai and Lucky Green, dealing with correlation
>analysis of messages sent and messages received...esentially pattern
>analysis.

This type of analysis is unlikely to provide useful results for
high-latency systems such as remailers. However, this analysis can be very
fruitful on near real time systems such as ill-designed chained http
anonymizers.

[Tim of course knows this, I just want to make sure that this is
universally understood.]

--Lucky Green <[email protected]> PGP encrypted mail preferred.

  Put a stake through the heart of DES! Join the quest at
  http://www.frii.com/~rcv/deschall.htm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Who "invented" remailers?
  - From: Tim May <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Who "invented" remailers?
  - From: Hallam-Baker <[email protected]>
- Who "invented" remailers?
  - From: Tim May <[email protected]>
- Re: Who "invented" remailers?
  - From: Tim May <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Webpage picketing
Next by Date: Re: Rotenberg as the Uber Enemy
Prev by thread: Re: Who "invented" remailers?
Next by thread: Re: Who "invented" remailers?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread