[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: McVeigh? Nimrods.....
> > Some on this list will even
> > say that the kids' deaths fortunately
> > reduced the negative impact their parents can have on the gene pool.
>
> Yes, some pathetic strange little boys swaggering around in never-never
> land. Lonely individuals with shriveled hearts, stunted morals, and
> feverish imaginations, who brag contemptuously of their superiority
> over "sheeple", and boast of their heroic roles in the coming
> revolution.
Very poetic, forgive me if I fail to see the point.
> And thank you, Lucky, for enlightening me -- it isn't the OKC bomber
> who is the criminal, it's the people who put their children in the
> daycare center! There's only one punishment suitable for such
> "criminally stupid" behavior! Lock and Load!
Now this to me is an ideal example of the sort of twisting of other
peoples points that is typical of Kents dialogue.
Lucky actually said that the parents were stupid putting their children
in that daycare centre. They were, the parents have no-one to blame but
themselves for the fact that their children were unnecessarily placed at
risk. however, this neither makes the parents guilty of any crime nor
does it absolve McVeigh, or whoever did it, from blame.
Lucky was right, the removal of those children from the gene pool was
probably advantageous, that does not make it right, simply a judgement
after the fact.
Datacomms Technologies data security
Paul Bradley, [email protected]
[email protected], [email protected]
Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
"Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"