[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [CNN] Stolen Laptops and lame 'solution'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <[email protected]>, on 06/11/97
at 05:22 PM, "Raymond Mereniuk" <[email protected]> said:
>I assume most notebooks which are recovered are found to be in the hands
>of a buyer rather than the person responsible for the actual theft.
>But, the eventual buyer is indirectly responsible for the initial theft
>of the notebook.
How is the buyer responsible even indirectly?
Someone puts an add in the paper NEC Laptop $1,500. I go and check it out
and buy it. Should it be my respocibility to call NEC over in Japan and
find out if it was reported stolen (if they even keep such records).
Should I have to call the manufacture every time I buy a some used
equipment? Perhaps I should have a background check done before I buy
anything.
If anyone is responcible for the theft other than the theif is the person
who was so carless with their equipment.
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBM59KoY9Co1n+aLhhAQEbLgP/f4DJARITmE0TH2A+unxHpXxLCOllQqCC
rUOATCG215sy6hK4Wy9a3k9AP3T4nAG/JpzAjK0n6Dw4poJLpZXE2PvjU3JGA2bH
vIXSjsBdecksFVFHwJyCKJTbds+TuUKwfRepyMRlhmg8cuJqh34XC037WRxPeE7s
dk9fdmyr1wA=
=XwvD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----