[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New PGP signatures

To: cypherpunks mailing list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: New PGP signatures
From: Rick Osborne <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 13:38:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]


[email protected] wrote:
>some asshole forgot to make PGP 5.0 freeware RSA key-generating

Okay, silly question here, but what's to stop someone from adding that
capability once the source is available?  (And if they knew they were going
to publish the source, why not just add the capability in the first place?)
-- Rick Osborne, <osborne@gateway,grumman.com>
"Unbelievable!  Even over the air waves, this Senator person eminates
evil as if it were musk!"
-- Gates, Legion of Superheroes

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New PGP signatures
  - From: Lucky Green <[email protected]>

References:
- New PGP signatures
  - From: Mark Grant <[email protected]>
- Re: New PGP signatures
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Anti-SPAM SPAM should be banned by Congress
Next by Date: Re: Extremely Disappointing: Political Cryptography
Prev by thread: Re: New PGP signatures
Next by thread: Re: New PGP signatures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread