[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comparing Cryptographic Key Sizes

To: Adam Back <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Comparing Cryptographic Key Sizes
From: Declan McCullagh <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 13:52:06 -0400
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <199706241351.OAA04279@hermes> ([email protected])
Sender: [email protected]


Thanks, Adam, for sending this along.

As it turns out, I'm working on an article about encryption and privacy
that will appear in Time Magazine next month. Yesterday I photocopied a few
pages of Applied Crypto and printed out the (I believe) February 1996 paper
on recommended key lengths and passed them around the office. Your summary
is even more handy.

-Declan



-------------------------
Declan McCullagh
Time Inc.
The Netly News Network
Washington Correspondent
http://netlynews.com/

References:
- Re: Comparing Cryptographic Key Sizes
  - From: Adam Back <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Hettinga's e$yllogism
Next by Date: Making _Real_ Money off a DES Break
Prev by thread: Re: Comparing Cryptographic Key Sizes
Next by thread: Re: Comparing Cryptographic Key Sizes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread