[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NRA and National Online Records Check bullshit
> > If someone commits a crime,
> > lock him or her up or shoot them, or whatever. But once the penalty is
> > over, all normal rights return. The right to vote, the right to free
> > speech, the right to own weapons, etc.
Depends on your perspective. I can see a valid case for a penalty for say
armed robbery that entails a lifetime, or 5/10/X year ban on ownership
of guns. Other violent armed crime like this could also incur such a
penalty as part of the sentence and I would consider this reasonable,
however, banning ownership of guns for any felony is definitely not at
all reasonable.
> > (Somehow most people think it's OK that convicted felons lose their rights
> > to vote and to have guns. (Once they're released, of course.) Do they think
> > convicted felons no longer have religious freedom? Can no longer write as
> > they wish? Jeesh.)
Speech cannot harm someone, if someone has commited a violent crime and
are likely to do so again, banning ownership of firearms sounds
reasonable to me, of course this is not going to be an effective ban, but
that is beside the point.
> I find it interesting that they find the right to vote as dangerous as the
> right to own a gun.
Indeed, I can see no justification whatsoever for banning participation
in the democratic process as an ongoing penalty for commision of crime
after the main sentence is completed.
Datacomms Technologies data security
Paul Bradley, [email protected]
[email protected], [email protected]
Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
"Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"