[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: forged cancels (Re: Entrust Technologies's Solo - free download)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 31 Jul 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Nno one is arugeing that. Both sides in this debait aggry that that is a
> > REAL BAD thing. Spam cancelers use an objective rules.
[...]
> Let me clarify two things:
>
> 1. "Spam cancellers" are not generally news admins.
I think you will have to justerfy this, the top spam cancellers are all
news adimns.
> 2. Once a cancel-forger builds a "reputation" as a "spam canceller",
> s/he often diversifies into "retromodetration"
There is little proof that this is the case. Even the netscum case could
have been considered spam.
[...]
> > Not even forgeries in my name? Not even out of the control spews from
> > fidonet?
>
> Correct.
Ok so if a mailing list gateway @bwalk.dm.com pumps thousands of broken
posts into usenet you don't wish them to be removed from usenet?
Nor if I post a message with your name and email, saying "Chris Lewis the
best thing that happened to usenet and I wish to have his baby."
If this is so sould I change the RB to reflect this.
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header.
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. ex-net.scum and proud
You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For
Themselves? --Terry Pratchett
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM+GTWKQK0ynCmdStAQERNQP+OlKyKfBQl0YOb3hBRipLXHfvnLSdhnWY
HF91PySz5wikYaF046efV+SeIN7+cMPj8+LPdYMvft8Wy/gQMU6Sjp8hVFz4l5kN
4ygAihiDmHXWsDbvpksiSuJBodvvE/EnSqrulpEYfJ2KNb33dCDfuoo8ARk5DZhD
+5l3c9SPDek=
=50wo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----