[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bulk postage fine (was Re: non-censorous spam control)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sun, 3 Aug 1997, Adam Back wrote:
> David Formosa <[email protected]> writes:
[...]
> > The best soultion given so far is Cause's suggestion of modifying
> > the fax law so that we can sue the spammers.
>
> Law, and suing and the internet don't mix.
You got to be jokeing, what about alomost every AOL vs. Cyberpromo or
Compuserve vs. Cyberpromo or all thouse other ISPs against Cyberpromo.
> Eg. Say I spam you via an anonymous remailer. So now who are you
> going to sue?
The spammers if there advertising a servese will need someway for me to
contact them. Some way for me to get the goods. Just anonomising the
email will not hide there identy. Any way pushing spammer email though
most email remailers will cause them to crash from sheare volume.
- --
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header.
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. ex-net.scum and proud
You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For
Themselves? --Terry Pratchett
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM+PrK6QK0ynCmdStAQHO5QP+PtZAMkM0LhIlDSiqVyPd0nFkpj9RUyGO
GOHGwCthHRNIOnUVO4RleulbIVErrm6dMauqKM3IL5MtjBz0iDWSQPk06OULq0e+
SQGyhl178H4WfZlZ+G7gcevh/Zyof0/rFJ6YBJX4MXfkitQNRdw4jCSoyiXjK7tt
zM1Cl75OdX8=
=AcLG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----