[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eternity Uncensorable?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, Adam Back wrote:
> Mark Grant <[email protected]> writes:
[...]
> > so all that a government need do to censor a particular site is to
> > scan for those messages and issue cancels.
> - I understand cancels are ignored a lot of places, due to problems with
> censorous people, and pranksters issuing tons of forged cancels.
And alot like to use canceles. If censorus groups (not neccery the
goverment) starts canceling we may be able to create a resector like that
used in news.admin.net-abuse.*
[...]
> I don't have any figures for how widespread the practice of
> configuring news to ignore cancels is.
Most sites still hounder cancels, a growing number ignore them (often for
preformence resons).
- --
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header.
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. ex-net.scum and proud
You Say To People "Throw Off Your Chains" And They Make New Chains For
Themselves? --Terry Pratchett
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM+ifYqQK0ynCmdStAQEhzwQAnw82Mk6XNlvQRUGVDVsBW63vOkFBZDV/
oLz3BUFTnrn4mHZxwuU2s+j1O2s7aLZP/ImD69XePILqKJDYiMJ6A6nc0reirNZ0
6WlkPl6jgpqWL8SKNidisjDWmwMXoYdkE6HSUB2rGoLgrtzvw4RXc6XcnQcG2Zb0
b8andhqfeTs=
=POHl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----