[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bloodlust or game-theory? (was Re: Alex le Heux)

To: Adam Back <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: bloodlust or game-theory? (was Re: Alex le Heux)
From: "Bradley E. Reynolds" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 16:44:31 -0400 (EDT)
cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]


> evaluating net benefits to human happiness in removal of corrupt
> government officials, perhaps you would be happier evaluating societal
> benefits of theoretically removing some 3rd world countries more
> corrupt officials.
> 
> It's not bloodlust, it's game theory...
> 
> Adam
> -- 

Yes, but you must first assert that this is a zero sum game. 

The semantics of such a philosophy are too much to think 
about now. :).

-Brad

References:
- bloodlust or game-theory? (was Re: Alex le Heux)
  - From: Adam Back <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: (Fwd) Release: Texas & Ruby Ridge killings (fwd)
Next by Date: Did you know?
Prev by thread: Re: Inside the Cypherpunks Cult
Next by thread: Re: Alex le Heux
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread