[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
None
- To: cypherpunks@toad.com
- Subject: None
- From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 19:03:25 -0400
- Comments: This message was remailed by a FREE automatedremailing service. For additional information on this service,send a message with the subject "remailer-help" toremailer@anon.efga.org. The body of the message will bediscarded. To report abuse, contact the operator atadmin@anon.efga.org. Headers below this point wereinserted by the original sender.
- Sender: owner-cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
>It's actually closer to a cult -- a small group with it's own shared
>reality -- a reality quite at variance with societal norms. The cult
>has its own terminology, and an underlying dogma to which these code
>words refer. The cult has "special knowledge" that has been revealed
>to them concerning massive changes that will happen to society --
>changes that will usher in a new world order. These changes may
>involve the world going through a cleansing fire of war of war and
>destruction.
Ahhh, look, the spook speaks.
>Certain of the members sport a messiah or a martyr complex. It is
>also quite common for cults to call for arming the brethren against
>the coming struggle -- even the Heaven's Gate group apparently had
>stashes of weapons.
>
>It's all so predictable.
I would just like to say this:
Kent is a shill.
Let me say it again:
Kent is a shill.
He's so predictable.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: None
- From: ? the platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>