[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys")

To: Adam Back <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys")
From: Lucky Green <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 05:26:07 -0700
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

At 10:43 AM 8/23/97 +0100, Adam Back wrote:
>The problem is what can you do about it?  Well I guess you could
>negatively structure the welfare hand out system to discourage them.
>You could scrap the welfare system.  They already offer free birth
>control advice to teenagers and hand out condoms free without
>questions etc.  Free abortions?

One thing that has been tried here, but was quickly shot down by the
welfare lobby was making Norplant (a two ? year hormonal birth control
device that gets implanted subcutaneously) implants a requirement for
receiving welfare checks.

--Lucky Green <[email protected]>
  PGP encrypted mail preferred.
  DES is dead! Please join in breaking RC5-56.
  http://rc5.distributed.net/

References:
- Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys")
  - From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
- Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys")
  - From: Adam Back <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys")
Next by Date: Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "court (fwd)
Prev by thread: Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys")
Next by thread: Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "courtappointed attorneys")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread