[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PGP signature legal standing?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <[email protected]>, on 09/18/97
at 02:57 PM, Russell Nelson <[email protected]> said:
>Is there any legal standing for a PGP signature? I'm tired of my luser
>customers faxing me legal documents, then expecting me to sign it and fax
>it back. Yeah, right, like photoshop can't cut-n-paste. I've got a fax
>modem on my Linux box, so I'm going to start (in fact have started)
>uuencoding the .g3 file, indicating my assent, and emailing it back to
>them.
Well I *ALWAYS* have any legal documents signed & notarized and then
snail-mailed. Faxing/e-mail is only used for drafts.
Be vary wary of Digital signature laws. They are being drafted by the
clueless and IMHO will cause more problems then they are worth in the long
run (no law is better than a bad law).
A case in point; I just received word that under the Utah Digital
Signature Law "encryption, of and by itself, would constitute the legal
force of signature". Now I received this third hand but the quote came
from the author of the Utah law. Why this is a *BAD* thing is left as an
exercise for the reader.
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBNCFTx49Co1n+aLhhAQEdfwQAl3+aVvuJJrkDMk2IP0rEO2hflyxlwdDj
z7/5BqRP3iLVhhzTq1whhle+Gl9G65dAWDiUcvwJ8V9vBI51VixFupWgMUTpNqqg
mBS6jVbJeJScUCeG5N7mKj5cM5mjbc+U2Ziw1ldmvNxX0SINSQkj8KOsg68pbYUu
qtMXCz3MZl8=
=Srwb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----