[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Oxley Amendment

To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Oxley Amendment
From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 11:44:53 -0700
In-Reply-To: <v03007803b0503363e7a0@[204.254.21.85]>
References: < <Pine.BSF.3.96.970925071158.21770B-100000@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to><01BCC93A.D0869BA0@dasc12-105.flash.net>
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@Algebra.COM

At 11:29 AM 09/25/1997 -0400, Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> wrote:
>Lucky has it right. SAFE is extremely unlikely to go to the floor without
>additional "compromise."

I thought the compromise wording was fairly well-defined
	Congress shall make Only A Few laws abridging freedom of speech,
	or of the press, or....


				Thanks!
					Bill
Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Regular Key PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF  3C85 B884 0ABE 4639

References:
- Re: Oxley Amendment
  - From: Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
- Re: Oxley Amendment
  - From: Michael Brock <hrast@flash.net>
- Re: Oxley Amendment
  - From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd)
Prev by thread: Re: Oxley Amendment
Next by thread: Re: Oxley Amendment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread