[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Remailers and ecash
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Remailers and ecash
- From: Anonymous <[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 17:32:48 -0400
- Comments: This message was remailed by a FREE automatedremailing service. For additional information on this service,send a message with the subject "remailer-help" [email protected]. The body of the message will bediscarded. To report abuse, contact the operator [email protected]. Headers below this point wereinserted by the original sender.
- Sender: [email protected]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Robert A. Costner wrote:
>The only thing I have heard you mention is latency, which is a
>feature programmed into the remailers. If anything, people would pay
>to add latency, not to take latency away.
And another point: Nobody wants to add latency. (There may be a few
applications, but they are rare.)
What people want is security and one way to get it (sometimes) is by
adding latency to their messages.
Ideally, you would send a message and it would arrive at its
destination in milliseconds with complete security.
Monty Cantsin
Editor in Chief
Smile Magazine
http://www.neoism.org/squares/smile_index.html
http://www.neoism.org/squares/cantsin_10.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAwUBNC/2ppaWtjSmRH/5AQGFvwf9Gt0lk4arO8YxSJmShOLkl0tzlG9Xwel2
LODIapK7/LeiHZ8sFMDBSnFqWf9B6gdiTODRapW7EaUsQIn2B6yBYvP9voO31K31
gPqScyravExP8ctubqPzB0tRdmWM1fcUGFhH0aI4pZpFiCjt1g3R5x88PhJ4HV3Z
a8J+Yq9gzKKm0X3qD9i9VcnPLRjJbLAmta1Vk6j/xm3bHlUHJbgynAyciblPVyCk
pB6YdxHgwNT2e+i2RkRYEvBm3poiHEmaRh4hwHt14SgqT6mmC+VGjkA+j+52woyL
NauD48mnEclO+Y973C+uOHfo7FBRmL/JFKiMh087SFjKv78fSu9BPg==
=xzIZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----