[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: S/MIME

To: Nobuki Nakatuji <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: S/MIME
From: ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 16:14:46 +1100 (EST)
cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


On Sun, 2 Nov 1997, Nobuki Nakatuji wrote:

> Is S/MIME secure than PGP ?

Its hard to tell.  However PGP has a number of advangers over S/MIME,
it is better supported by cilents, PGP signtures are smaller then S/MIME
sigs.  In addtion S/MIME sigs normaly have encoded in them a lot of
infomation about the user makeing it very difficalt to use via an anon
remailer.

Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header. 
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. 
Save the ABC Is $0.08 per day too much to pay?   ex-net.scum and proud
I'm sorry but I just don't consider 'because its yucky' a convincing argument

References:
- S/MIME
  - From: "Nobuki Nakatuji" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Smartcards - Drivers Licenses in New Jersey
Next by Date: the one Unbreakable crypto scheme.
Prev by thread: S/MIME
Next by thread: Re: S/MIME
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread