Re: Protocols for Insurance to Maintain Privacy

[Tim May <tcmay@got.net>]

At 11:58 AM -0700 11/5/97, John Kelsey wrote:

>I know.  Let me make it clear that I am not at all
>interested in banning private testing, coercing insurance
>companies or anyone else into agreements they don't want to
>make, etc.  I am saying it would be nice if I could buy
>insurance against the results of the tests before I took
>them.  The problem is, I can't see a really workable way to
>do this, because there's no way to keep people from taking
>the test beforehand.

That's my point. Since there can be no way to determine if someone has had
themselves tested, such "wouldn't it be nice" scenarios are meaningless.

--Tim May


The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES:   408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^2,976,221   | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."