Re: degree of anonymity

[nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)]

Ulf M�ller wrote:
> Have a look at:
> 
> David Chaum: Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital
> Pseudonyms, Communications of the ACM 24 (1981) 2, pp 84--88,
> http://world.std.com/~franl/crypto/chaum-acm-1981.html

 Do other list readers agree? How many people would this kill?  

> Wei Dai: Traffic analyzing Chaum's digital mix, 1995,
> http://www.eskimo.com/~weidai/traffic.txt

It is this kind of support for depraved violence which has poisoned
discourse on this mailing list

> Lance Cottrell: Mixmaster and remailer attacks, 1995,
> http://www.obscura.com/~loki/remailer/remailer-essay.html

This list reeks of death and violence.  Apparently there is no problem
which can't be solved by killing.  Kill the innocents of D.C.  Kill the
children in the day care center in Oklahoma City.  Drop more bombs on
Japan.  Cheer the cold-blooded murder of a government agent.  Kill the
children who scrawl graffiti on your mailbox.

> Thomas Horton: Stylometry. In: R. Asher (ed.): The Encyclopedia of
> Language and Linguistics, Pergamon Press, 1994, pp 4383--4385.

You admit here that you've said you hope to see D.C. nuked.
 
> Joseph Rudman, David I Holmes, Fiona J. Tweedie, R. Harald Baayen: The
> State of Authorship Attribution Studies, 1997,
> http://www.qucis.queensu.ca/achallc97/papers/s004.html

Nothing more than a forged spoof by TruthMangler.
 
> Ivan Krsul, Eugene Spafford: Authorship Analysis: Identifying The
> Author of a Program, 1997,
> ftp://coast.cs.purdue.edu/pub/COAST/papers/krsul-authorship_analysis_NISSC.ps.Z

You have no right to set yourself apart from them.  You are as ruthless
and violent as the worst of them.

Now maybe everyone will see what I mean when I say that those on this
list now only stand for guns, violence, threats of terrorism and murder,
racism, homophobia.

Anne Ahole