[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: evolRe: What cypherpunks used to be

To: "wabe" <wabe@smart.net>, <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: evolRe: What cypherpunks used to be
From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 13:01:15 -0800
In-Reply-To: <01bcf27e$a115e8e0$737f61ce@dave>
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@Algebra.COM

At 02:58 AM 11/16/1997 -0800, wabe wrote:
>ANONYMOUS said:
>> evolve or die
>
>Evolution requires death, by definition.  

No - it requires different reproduction rates.
If the old population hangs around without dying, 
or reproduction works by splitting, that's fine.
Seems to have happened to the list....
				Thanks! 
					Bill
Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Regular Key PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF  3C85 B884 0ABE 4639

References:
- evolRe: What cypherpunks used to be
  - From: "wabe" <wabe@smart.net>

Prev by Date: No Subject
Next by Date: Re: Exporting crypto from Japan : Was Tim May's offensive racism
Prev by thread: evolRe: What cypherpunks used to be
Next by thread: Re: The Policeman Inside
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread