[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Report on UN conference on Internet and racism
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <[email protected]>, on
11/18/97
at 06:28 PM, Jim Burnes <[email protected]> said:
>On Tue, 18 Nov 1997, William H. Geiger III wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>> Hi Dekan,
>>
>> I think that there is plenty of case law of extending constutional
>> protections to non-citizens. One that comes to mind were the rulings
>> against California inwhich the courts ruled the they were obligated to
>> provide schooling and social services to illegal aliens (a really fucked
>> rulling IMNSHO but if some good can come out of it no sense not making use
>> of it).
>>
>Interesting. I was under the opinion that schooling and "social
>services" were no more constitutional rights then, say, free food or a
>pot to piss in.
>Constitutional rights are contractual government guarantees to protect
>well known natural rights. (pleez send all natural rights flames
>straight to /dev/null since we all know what they are and have different
>name for them)
>Because of the kind of animals that we are, natural law has evolved as an
>emergent philosophical model that protects the right of the individual to
>do as they please and to profit from the fruits of their labors so long
>as they harm no one else. I pretty much massacred that definition, but
>hey, I'm not getting payed for this.
>How can we provide *services* to non-citizens and call that a right?
>Who the hell pays for it?
>Of course you could make the argument that involutarily providing
>services even for citizens is brain damaged, but we call that socialism
>and take it up to argue on some other channel than cypherpunks.
Oh I agree with you here that there is not constutional right to social
services. I wish I had a reference to the court decisions on this. It was
a year or two ago regarding one of the balot propositions in California
that would cut off various social services to illegal aliens. I am going
off memory here but I don't think it ever got all the way to the SC. If
anyone has a reference to this case please post.
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBNHJGN49Co1n+aLhhAQHA5AP/aA8EdlyfTUL3Ev/Kbz3rGqtSwcxRB3Gf
Hp8kQxXXOOazlGVogPvKM4qaeiwXoYKrTbqv2cdG4S/cKJv2sZ39ZsGb5xaztPiD
drezpHo2EJH5iayB5Pytb2EkBg3taTLj5gB33um2Cxq3UEDII/fFc1jCK35kbWYQ
NS8HmsWCv84=
=xFp8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----