[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Russ Alberry/CAUCE vs. the Cypherpunks (was: Re: RESULT: comp.org.cauc
I do not think that your message made it to USENET, TruthMonger.
igor
TruthMonger wrote:
>
>
> lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
> >
> > Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > * I am specifically pissed at Igor about trolling for votes on ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > random newsgroups and on Cypherpunks.
>
> > In what sense are you using the word "trolling"? Are you saying that the
> > mention of a proposal to ban anonymity is considered "trolling" when posted
> > amongst a group of pro-privacy, pro-anonymity individuals such as the
> > Cypherpunks?
>
> Sounds like he is only objecting to you discussing issues important
> to you with groups you belong to and groups that you *don't* belong to.
> Sounds like Chelsea is pushing daddy's fascist agenda at Stanford.
>
> > Why is publicly disagreeing with you considered a "propaganda campaign"?
> > Why should the C.A.U.C.E. brand of propaganda be the only variety allowed?
>
> Because fickless ducks live in fear of individuals who threaten
> their ability to hide under phantom security blankets.
>
> > When I first heard of the C.A.U.C.E., my initial thought was that it was a
> > good idea. Finally a means to fight back against the spammers. Now I'm
> > starting to wonder what sort of agenda is driving some of these illogical
> > anti-privacy requirements.
>
> Often, it is just the result of people who come up with some inane
> brainstorm that looks good on the surface, but are too intellectually
> lazy to think it through and resent anyone who does so (thus destroying
> their petty work of self-proclaimed 'genius'.
> The real losers end up doing a lot of campaigning to make up for the
> insufficiency of their logic, under the delusion that getting as many
> others as possible to jump on their bandwagon will somehow increase
> their low level of self-esteem.
>
> Sounds to me like the dweeb is pissed because he had to do a lot
> of blather-spamming to overcome the effects of Igor's rational
> and balanced posts on the subject.
> Perhaps his next project could be to promote a vote on a new
> value for 'pi'.
>
> TruthMonger
>
- Igor.