[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cypherpunks, PGP Buyout, & Writing Code...
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Cypherpunks, PGP Buyout, & Writing Code...
- From: [email protected]
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 09:54:55 -0500
- Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.Please report problems or inappropriate use to theremailer administrator at <[email protected]>.
- Sender: [email protected]
[NOTE: This message was remailed by an anonymous remailing system.
The original sender is unknown, and has inserted the From: header.
This information has not been verified. As with all mail or news
messages, you should examine the headers carefully before responding.
Direct questions about this system to <[email protected]>.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jim Choate wrote:
>Perhaps the buy-out of PGP is a good thing. Consider that now there is a
>clear and present motive for Cypherpunks to start writing the next wave of
>world-class crypto...it really is the *only* shure way that the process
>doesn't get subverted...we're no longer able to rely on a single commen
>source of crypto tools.
Perhaps we should hold a Requiem for PGP, or maybe an Irish wake instead.
Let's take a look back at some of the good things PGP did toward furthering
the use of crypto.
Phil Zimmerman took public key cryptography and brought it to a fairly wide
base of users: 4 million people, plus or minus a million or two. :-) That's
rather substantial given that less than 100 million people are estimated to
be on the Net right now. Think of how many more yet-to-be Net users will
demand strong cryptography in their communications, be it personal,
financial, legal, recreational...who knows what else?
PGP also showed how both a freeware and paid-for version of encryption
software can be marketed together. The paid-for version of PGP 5.0 allows
users to generate the new El Gamal/DSS keys as well as the familiar RSA
keys, while the freeware only allows for the former. The important lesson
here, I think, is that the writers of "the next wave of world-class crypto"
can make money from the paid-for versions with the extra bells and whistles
that some of us like, but they are not stifling the expansion of their
software's user base because they are offering a freeware version that
implements the basic protocols for communicating with users of the paid-for
version, and of course other freeware users.
Nerthus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBNIUHwxa1d3zm4nqOEQIG4wCgsDqyMsl64IsDwz814eL9SwdJmu0AoJ9M
OaSWiBx2cZZqq97f0GZ1GuJR
=Mqbu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----