[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Ok children...
Hi,
Would you gentlemen be so kind as to take your personal and apparently petty
squabble elsewhere?
Thanks for your prompt help with this matter.
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| |
| We built your fort. We will not have it used against us. |
| |
| John Wayne - Allegheny Uprising |
| |
| |
| _____ The Armadillo Group |
| ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA |
| /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ |
| .', |||| `/( e\ |
| -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate |
| [email protected] |
| 512-451-7087 |
|____________________________________________________________________|
Forwarded message:
> From [email protected] Sat Dec 13 16:27:26 1997
> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 23:04:07 +0100 (MET)
> Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected]
> From: [email protected] (Anonymous)
> Organization: Replay and Company UnLimited
>
> X-001: Replay may or may not approve of the content of this posting
> X-002: Report misuse of this automated service to <[email protected]>
> X-URL: http://www.replay.com/remailer/
> Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server,alt.cypherpunks,news.admin.net-abuse.email,alt.privacy,alt.censorship,comp.org.eff.talk
> Subject: Re: Another of Gary Burnore's Lies Exposed
> References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Precedence: bulk
> X-Mailing-List: [email protected]
> X-List-Admin: [email protected]
> X-Loop: ssz.com
> X-Language: English, Russian, German
>
> [email protected] (Gary L. Burnore) wrote:
>
> > X-No-Archive: yes
>
> > :> That must mean that I'm harassing you as well, right?
> > :
> > :That is exactly my objection to the tactics of Gary Burnore and the DataBasix
> > :gang.
> >
> > You've posted no evidence tactics were EVER used. Naturally, you expect
> > everyone to believe you and naturally, a few like sam will.
>
> I don't expect anybody to "believe me". That's why I have posted a URL to a
> post by Jeff Burchell in which he outlines your tactics, such as your demand
> that he turn over his logs to you, which would have had the effect of
> compromising the remailer's security and eroding confidence in it. Is that
> really what you wanted? For remailer users to distrust the remailer net and
> stop using it? You have still not explained why you wanted the remailer logs
> and what you intended to do with the names and addresses contained therein.
>
> > : He calls
> > :the kind of discussion that the three of us are engaging in "harassment", and
> > :has even, upon occasion, accused posts critical of him of constituting
> > :"libel".
> >
> > You have from time to time constituted libel.
>
> Would you care to prove that? Saying something that Gary Burnore or Belinda
> Bryan don't like is not "libel". To be "libel" a statement must be both
> DEFAMATORY as well as FALSE. While being reminded of your own actions
> several months ago might prove to be embarassing, it's not libel.
>
> What was really laughable was when your fellow DataBasix staff member Billy
> McClatchie accused another anonymous usenet poster of "slander"! He must have
> gone to the same law school as Belinda. <g>
>
> > That's not abuse. Your
> > harassment is only that, harassment. The ABUSE is UCE-Baiting. The fact that
> > some remailer operators are now taking measures to prevent UCE-Baiting is
> > evidence not only that the problem existed, but that something COULD be done
> > about it.
>
> That's not what Jeff's post said. It said that your pretext for demanding his
> user logs was an "unflattering post", not all this nonsense about "spam baiting"
> that you invented later.
>
> My "harassment"? You keep whining about my so-called "harassment", but you
> have yet to prove ANY of it.
>
> > :Actually, Gary may unwittingly prove to be a "friend" of remailers, yet.
> >
> >
> > Unwittingly? I was never NOT a friend of remailers. YOU on the otherhand may
> > simply be unwittingly trying to shut them down. I happen to believe you're
> > doing it on purpose, but maybe, just maybe, you have no clue what you're
> > doing.
>
> What would people have to be smoking (and inhaling) to believe that nonsense?
> Anyone who demands that a remailer operator violate the privacy of all of his
> users to placate one chronic whiner is no "friend" to remailers. Such
> "friends" they can do without. What do you think it would have done for the
> reputation of remailer security if Jeff had actually kept logs and had turned
> them over to individuals such as you and Belinda?
>
> Do you really think it would be more "pro remailer" to just pretend that your
> attempt to attempt to obtain sendmail logs from the Huge Cajones Remailer
> didn't occur?
>
> Of the two of us, I'm the one that admits to actually USING remailers. For me
> to try to shut them down would make no sense.
>
> > If you don't like being called the anon asshole, stop being an asshole.
>
> If you don't like being called anti-privacy, stop being anti-privacy.
>