[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Clinton signs draconian antipiracy law, from the Netly News


At 02:46 PM 12/18/97 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>"� 1008. Prohibition on certain infringement actions
>
>"No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement 
>...based on the
>noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device or medium for making
>digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings. "
...
>The HRA places no limits on the numbers of such tapings. All that matters
>is that he is not selling or renting them out.

The N.E.T. Act redefines commercial gain to include if you exchange copies
of recordings with people.  Presumably if you and I were to trade CD's we
might be  engaged in commercial gain.  If we trade copies we definitely
appear to be financially gaining under the act's new definition.




  -- Robert Costner                  Phone: (770) 512-8746
     Electronic Frontiers Georgia    mailto:[email protected]  
     http://www.efga.org/            run PGP 5.0 for my public key