Re: Completely anonymous communications ARE only for "Criminals"

[The Sheriff <sheriff@speakeasy.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>> :Why would a pager company want to block calls from pay phones?
>>
>> Because they (the pager companies) have been ordered to pay the charges
>> related to calls made to their service from pay phones.  18.5 cents per call
>> was the number the fed agreed to.  Keeping up with the telecommunications
>> industry is difficult, eh?

Very interesting.  That hasen't hit my area, as far as I know.

In addition, paging from a pay phpne (at least, where I'm located)
is of no use unless you're using a telephone number to alert the
owner of the pager to your location (which makes it easier to find
my friends, granted), since pay phones have been re-hardwired to
reject incoming calls.

Best wishes and fresh-roasted peanut taste,
The Sheriff. -- ***<REPLY TO: sheriff@speakeasy.org>***
- ---
As kinky as it sounds, finger me to see my PGP key and
confirm the signature attached to this message.
- ---
Any and all SPAM will be met with immediate prosecutory
efforts.  Solicitations are NOT welcome here!
- ---
        ----BEGIN INFLAMATORY BLOCK----
Version: 160 (IQ)
Comments: Definitely one of their greatest misses.

Reporter: "Do you know what Public Enemy is?"
- ---
Citizen: "Public enemy?"
          [long pause]
         "Probably somebody in office."
        -----END INFLAMATORY BLOCK-----


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBNJ+DVwBMw4+NR29ZAQHt5gf/efGXE/0jPvQvtDFri//drmzhE4dRIU6I
jD1JsLmLrjvNUEzzFo8QNpe4q7Fbx9HvQyfDjjIC19F/4yHv2kFs+PcQ1C49s1q5
dc/BXOrxvoJTN9HSiQ56FYosAUU2KnJJ9HalIb52CzajpJsFCqUJEVww0djqKb7v
XIqXCY3Ax8cNsxhS/F/AnWeq0FC2ONQCcNWWGHPc0h77KEutPjY2yDPwSXA2Wb2E
+xqEqC4D/mZmXYc5AWe8VjXLyUDZ7sUT4K7UmL13y0wC9X3NFKZgsUC5YPV3Wb5j
lTeE6RHQG38F+/ozYsWanYFXtjJ8VWMX4xK73P0qL6ieQtFvyrPHMQ==
=ixle
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----