[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Remailers & N.E.T.

To: Tim May <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Remailers & N.E.T.
From: "Robert A. Costner" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 1998 16:25:41 -0500
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <v03102803b0daeb29f609@[207.167.93.63]>
References: <[email protected]><[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

At 12:47 PM 1/8/98 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>(Though the SPA and others may then go after the remailers. Ironically, the
>CDA exempted remailers--though not by name--from liability for messages.)

Unfortunately you are semi wrong here.  The CDA specifically does not cover
Intellectual property matters, and the SPA has consistently insisted that
the ISPs are liable for what their users do with copyrighted materials.

  -- Robert Costner                  Phone: (770) 512-8746
     Electronic Frontiers Georgia    mailto:[email protected]  
     http://www.efga.org/            run PGP 5.0 for my public key

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Remailers & N.E.T.
  - From: Marshall Clow <[email protected]>

References:
- Remailers & N.E.T.
  - From: "Robert A. Costner" <[email protected]>
- No Subject
  - From: Anonymous <[email protected]>
- Re: Remailers & N.E.T.
  - From: Tim May <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: your mail
Next by Date: time-stamp server uses (Re: Question on U.S. Postal Service and crypto)
Prev by thread: Re: Remailers & N.E.T.
Next by thread: Re: Remailers & N.E.T.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread