Re: rant on the morality of confidentiality (fwd)

[David Miller <dm0@avana.net>]

> ... If an art critic declines
> to publish something, its a loss probably only to his fellow art critics,
> but if a mathematician or a biologist or a physicist doesn't publish, it's
> a loss for more than just his colleagues.

The author has a skewed view which says that science is more important
than
art.  Simply not true.  Don't get too narrow a view of "progress".

--David Miller

middle  rival
devil rim lad

Windows '95 -- a dirty, two-bit operating system.