[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Chicken "anons" and "nobody's"

To: StanSquncr <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Chicken "anons" and "nobody's"
From: ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 08:58:01 +1100 (EST)
cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, StanSquncr wrote:

> In a message dated 98-03-19 05:11:50 EST, [email protected] writes:
> 
> << Well, Stan, all of the news you read ultimately comes from the one person
>  selected by Clinton to drive The Propoganda Machine up in Washington, DC. >>
> 
> And what planet do you live on?

Yar, everybody knows that it is Rupid Murdoc who runs all the news.

Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia see the url in my header. 
Never trust a country with more peaple then sheep. 
Support NoCeM http://www.cm.org/                   
I'm sorry but I just don't consider 'because its yucky' a convincing argument

References:
- Re: Chicken "anons" and "nobody's"
  - From: StanSquncr <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Chicken "anons" and "nobody's"
Next by Date: Re: Will New Sendmail Block Remailers?
Prev by thread: Re: Chicken "anons" and "nobody's"
Next by thread: Re: Chicken "anons" and "nobody's"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread