[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Or is it Pat Robertson?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Or is it Pat Robertson?
From: StanSquncr <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 02:08:04 EST
Cc: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

In a message dated 98-03-24 00:31:09 EST, [email protected] writes:

<< >You see, add 14 + 1 + 9 + 9 + 1 and you get 34.

 >700 - 34 is, guess what - 666!

 >I guess that proves it!  ;-)

 Hmmm Louis Farakan school of Number Theory >>

Hmmm, didn't seem to bother you when the same theory was used against Bill
Gates!  Not surprized, the response came from, you guessed it cypher's,
another paranoid "Know-nothing" -

<< -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: 2.6.3a-sha1
 Charset: cp850
 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000

 iQCVAwUBNRdFpo9Co1n+aLhhAQFDpgP8CEFgqntvKfNWWXuPgo0M8pyvYMudl51p
 g/QyXmn2bs9WZ+3WYwDZlzvirKPa1LuDK85zUGGemMPbZQg2y7PSkyIi3F9kCqoC
 PLOnCW1ft2dbmiaRZxqbR6LcTU5Ti24XZoe70du0nz6M5vw8vPVW96ZCx0W9Vt2r
 DXkeg20YFYQ=
 =a5pE
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>

Stan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Or is it Pat Robertson?
  - From: "William H. Geiger III" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Or is it Pat Robertson?
Next by Date: Re: Computer Expert Witness Needed *Immediately*
Prev by thread: Re: Or is it Pat Robertson?
Next by thread: Re: Or is it Pat Robertson?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread