[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A new Swiss banking novel
On Mon, 4 May 1998 [email protected] wrote:
> On Mon, 4 May 1998, Xcott Craver wrote:
> > I advise crypto proponents to halt any analogy-making to
> > firearms, for this reason. Nothing against guns, of course; but to gain
> > acceptance crypto cannot be dropped in the same conceptual bin as guns.
>
> And spin the same propoganda wheel as the Man? Not me. I don't see crypto
> gaining acceptance among the masses out of fear.
I don't think it's spinning the same propaganda wheel. In
fact, if anything, you're probably giving in to "the Man" by
letting this view of crypto persist. That is, IMHO; since
IMHO the feds are trying to push this view of crypto.
The implicit connection between crypto and weapons is what
will allow the feds to cater to that fear to get it banned.
Further, as many people simply don't own guns, many are
easily detached from gun-related issues. A large part of
the CA smoking ban was due to this same detachment: a large
non-smoking majority really doesn't give a damn about
smokers' rights, because they don't see it hurting them.
The TRVTH is that crypto will be used by just about anyone
who does anything over an electronic link. People will
need it for friendly day-to-day transactions. A crypto ban
will be harder to push if people see crypto in this way:
less like a gun, more like a car or a beeper; maybe useful to
criminals but useful in everyday affairs to law-abiding people
too---nay, NECESSARY--and a silly thing to ban.
If you stick with the line that "crypto, like a gun, can
be used by good guys as well as bad guys," you'll give
across the opposite impression. Rather than seeing crypto
as something they want and will use a lot, many people will see
crypto as something they probably won't even have in their
house, something whose actual use is something to be avoided.
I mean, you could probably get steak knives banned in today's
climate by defending them like that.
-Xcott