[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anymous twit dealing in hypocracy
- To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Anymous twit dealing in hypocracy
- From: [email protected] (Anonymous)
- Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 13:33:06 +0200 (MET DST)
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.gburnore,triangle.general,alt.vigilantes,alt.netcom.emeritus,alt.cypherpunks,news.admin.censorship,alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server,misc.kids,news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
- Organization: Replay Associates, L.L.P.
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- Sender: [email protected]
[email protected] (William J. McClatchie) wrote:
> X-Comment: Aw, are you offended?
[...]
> > Do you operate a remailer, McClatchie?
>
> Do you? Which one?
>
> Personally, too many people use them for abusive purposes these days to
> feel like making the effort. Just look in triangle.general for posts from
> [email protected] for an example of someone using a remailer to harrass
> someone else.
Perhaps you ought to reread your own header line, if you don't like what is
being posted: "Aw, are you offended>". Many remailer users utilize them
to avoid retaliation for hypersensitive netcops like you, Gary Burnore, and
Steve Crisp.
If everyone posted strictly politically correct content that wouldn't offend
anyone, there would be little need for anonymity. But threatening to
"beat the living fuck out of" someone because he disagreed with what someone
posted is ample reason to withhold one's name and e-mail address.
If you don't like to read anonymous posts, please feel free to learn the
proper use of a killfile, McClatchie. BTW, only one of us is using a
proper, RFC-compliant e-mail address in the From: line.