[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Junger et al.
On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, Ernest Hua wrote:
>I think we are in violent agreement here ...
>
>Except that it seems odd that speech is no longer 1st amendment
>protected as soon as it can be interpreted by a machine to do something.
>So, then, if I want to deny you first amendment protections for
>something, I can simply write a compiler to turn your words into machine
>executable code, and suddenly, your words are no longer protected
>speech. How could that be a reasonable interpretation of functional
>versus not?
>
By the same reasoning as in my posting:
>>
>>As another example, bringing together one pound of inert metal with
>>another one pound of the same inert metal was not considered to be
>>explosive -- until U235 was used for the inert metal and properly
>>compressed. The difference is semantic, not syntatic.
>>
Thus, your instructions to bring together those two one-pound pieces
would be your right to free speech -- maybe it is poetry -- as long
as that is not recognized as a federal crime! After it boooms the
first time... it is a device, and it is immediately recognized to be
an unlawful one.
>Secondly, Gwin said that encryption is a special class of software which
>is MORE functional. This is definitely a misunderstanding, to say the
I could not find that quote -- "more functional".
BTW, I think that Gwin was struggling to express the notion that
source code (syntax) is a device whenever there is a clear binding
between that source code and known semantics, together with proper
pragmatics (the enviroment, as defined in semiotics), in order to
perform the desired function.
This is called a Just In-Iime Compiler ... and Gwin is 100% right
when he affirms that the difference between source code and compiled
code is null regarding its effects -- its desired function.
Thus, if the device is unlawful then it must be unlawful both as a
source code and as a compiled code.
Cheers,
Ed Gerck
______________________________________________________________________
Dr.rer.nat. E. Gerck [email protected]
http://novaware.cps.softex.br
--- Meta-Certificate Group member, http://www.mcg.org.br ---