Re: LACC: Re: Is hate code speech?

[jkthomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com>]

At 12:42 PM 8/26/98 -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>William H. Geiger III wrote:
>> >Sad that I wasted this much time responding.
>> 
>> Why, because I challenge your PC dogma and require to to rationally
>> justify it? We have an old saying here "If you are scared son, then say
>> you are scared". If you are unable to rationally and objectively justify
>> your PC dogma than just say so.
>
>Smirk.  /I'm terrified/  I've said it before, and I'll say it again:
>
>Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

<chortle>
oh yes, an EXCELLENT justification of your 'PC beliefs'  How exactly does
that answer the challenge to defend your point of view?  Ad hominem attacks
are pretty low, even for list-members, think-ye-not?
</chortle>



-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 james 'keith' thomson <jkthomson@bigfoot.com>  www.bigfoot.com/~ceildh
 jkthomson:C181 991A 405C EAFB 2C46 79B5 B1DC DB78 8196 122D [06.07.98]
 ceildh   :1D79 59AF ED75 5945 6003 8240 DA34 ACCA 9DE4 6BC9 [05.14.98]
 ICQ:746241 <keys> at pgp.mit.edu     ...and former sysop of tnbnog BBS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jennings Corollary to the Law of Selective Gravity:
  The chance of the bread falling with the butter side down
  is directly proportional to the value of the carpet.
=======================================================================