RE: Clinton's fake apologies

["X" <xasper8d@lobo.net>]

What chance is there that the Paula Jones case was dismissed BECAUSE Wild
Bill lied under oath?

Remember OJ?

X

-----Original Message-----
From:	owner-cypherpunks@minder.net [mailto:owner-cypherpunks@minder.net] On
Behalf Of Petro
Sent:	Monday, September 14, 1998 9:03 AM
To:	Jim Gillogly; declan@well.com
Cc:	cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject:	Re: Clinton's fake apologies

At 10:49 AM -0500 9/12/98, Jim Gillogly wrote:
>IANAL (feel free to weigh in here, Unicorn), but I heard on one show or
>another that lying under oath is perjury only if it's material to the
>suit.  Since the Jones case was dismissed, it was argued that even if he
>lied then, it wasn't material and thus wasn't perjury -- they claimed that
>nobody had every been convicted of perjury for lying in a case that was
>dismissed.