CHRYSLER AWARD NOMINATION STATEMENT 9/15/98 12:30 PM

[bill payne <billp@nmol.com>]

Tuesday 9/15/98 12:39 PM 

e-mail

Ms Vikki Hardy
Chrysler Award for Innovative Design
c/o Bozell Advertising
1000 Town Center, 15th Floor
Southfield, MI 48075-1241
248 262 8643
vhardy@detroit.bozell.com

We are sending our submission by 

1	e-mail
2	hardcopy
3	diskette with .htm and .txt files

by priority certified mail.	             

Best
bill


	             CHRYSLER AWARD NOMINATION STATEMENT
			        9/15/98 12:30 PM
			
American forefathers drafted the Constitution and laws of our country
shortly after having suffered injustice.   Fresh in their minds were
strategies used by their oppressors.  Writers of the Constitution and
laws anticipated ways to subvert our system.  Therefore, our forefathers
designed safeguards into our legal system to prevent future injustice.

But these safeguards DON�T appear to be working today.

Morales and Payne designed a strategy using the National Security Agency
[NSA], Sandia National Laboratories, the US Federal Court System, and
publication on Internet to illustrate how the US government has
deteriorated.

Arthur Morales WAS a supervisor at Sandia Labs in 1991.  Morales and
Manuel Garcia organized a class action lawsuit on behalf of Hispanics
against Sandia.

Sandia settled Morales� and Garcia�s lawsuit.  Department of Energy
acknowledged from Freedom of Information Act  [FOIA] requests that as
of  December 31, 1995 Morales cost Sandia $567,137 in legal fees.

Sandia retaliated against Morales.  Morales sued Sandia in New Mexico
District Court.  Morales lost.

William Payne wrote a technical report describing �deficiencies�  NSA�s
cryptographic algorithms http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm.  Sandia
transferred Payne to break electronics locks for the Federal Bureau of
Invesitgation [FBI].  Payne refused to do illegal work. 
http://www.jya.com/whp1.htm.

Payne sued Sandia in Federal Court.  Payne lost and court records were
sealed.

FBI agent Bernardo Perez  led a class action lawsuit against the FBI for
race discrimination against Hispanic FBI agents. 
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/1995/w951482w.txt

Perez won.  Perez was assigned agent-in-charge of the FBI in Albuquerque
for settlement.  But Perez lost money.

Morales and Payne learned that the FBI extorted an inexpensive from
Perez by telling Perez that the FBI was GUARANTEED to win on appeal in
Federal Circuit.

With Perez� and others knowledge of circuit courts, Morales and Payne
appealed their respective cases pro se to the Tenth Circuit.  

In Payne�s case Sandia failed to submit its Brief of the Appellees on
time. Then falsified its certificate of service when Payne filed to
remand.

In Morales� case Sandia submitted a deficient Brief of the Appellees
which was returned but failed to serve Morales with its brief.

Payne and Morales both won at the Tenth Circuit on technicalities.  But
judges awarded the wins to Sandia.

All attempts by Morales and Payne to get copies of the docket for their
respective Tenth Circuit cases failed.

Therefore, Morales and Payne hatched a plan to get the dockets and
expose government misconduct.  

Payne previously made FOIA requests to NSA for  copies of messages and
translations given to Iraq during the Iraq/Iran war, copies of Libyan
messages intercepted by NSA, and NSA cryptographic algorithms Payne
thought contained deficiencies.

Morales and Payne sued NSA pro se for the documents. Lawsuit progress
was broadcast on Internet through e-mail and

     http://www.aci.net/kalliste/speccoll.htm
     http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm

And Payne wrote

 Black and White Test of Cryptographic Algorithms

criticizing the US government�s crypto contest.  http://zolatimes.com.

Morales and Payne FINALLY got copies of dockets from their respective
cases from the Tenth Circuit using Internet as an innovative tool.