[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
- From: Anonymous <[email protected]>
- Date: 16 Sep 1998 16:47:28 -0000
- Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.Please report problems or inappropriate use to theremailer administrator at <[email protected]>.
- Sender: [email protected]
Jim Choate wrote:
>
> > Declan McCullagh <[email protected]> wrote:
> > lying under oath is perjury, whether you like it or not.
>
> As rare as it is, I agree with Declan here. If Clinton would lie under oath
> about a non-crime (ie sex between consenting adults) what would he do if
> faced with a real issue?
>
> He should have said "Yeah, I had sex with her. What business is it of
> yours?".
>
Presumably he should lie to protect the state. So lieing per se isn't the problem.
It is the use of the privilege where it doesn't apply that upsets you. Murky water
for impeachment, methinks.
Furthermore, we have gone from the CDA to government publication of pornography in
short order. Farbeit for any cypherpunk to complain.