[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: It's finally over (was Re: Explanation of Harald Fragner and cypherpunks)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yes, but you can't expect the masses sign all their email, not yet
anyway, so
you cannot require cryptographic authentication for mailing lists and
services subscriptions (esp. for-profit services that would not like to
turn
away anyone).
That is what you are talking about isn't it?
Matt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William H. Geiger III [mailto:[email protected]]
> >What we really need is an automated system that could
> >authorize/deny an address prior to the code/password
> >being sent that would keep track of distribution list
> >addresses and such.
>
> >Perhaps I'll create one myself soon.
>
> PGP, Digital signatures, CA's, Authentication, ... This *is* a crypto
> related group isn't it?
>
> How does Thwart, Verisign, or the other CA's handle
> authentication of an e-mail address in there low level cert
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBNgBgOxU5HlNX4dnFEQKQSACghI+z9TK3uXdAbUQMfX2e+ksuk38An3s9
aV7TVzna/+S+cxFXrOmzoxOW
=n91J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----