[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ArcotSign (was Re: Does security depend on hardware?)




Greg Broiles wrote:

> I didn't understand the relationship between this scheme and Rivest's
> chaffing and winnowing which you note was cited as a reference in the SSC
> paper - would you (or someone else) mind explaining the connection? The
> closest I can get is thinking that there's a parallel between trying to
> guess which PIN in the SSC system is valid and which isn't, and the
> "winnowing" part of the Rivest protocol; but that doesn't seem like an
> especially meaningful or illuminating relationship. It looks like maybe a
> footnote was dropped, which would've tied the Rivest paper to a particular
> passage in the paper.

I like to mention that sometime ago there was a lot of discussions
in comp.security.pgp.discuss. My personal opinions on shaffing and 
winnowing are summarized in

    http://www.stud.uni-muenchen.de/~mok-kong.shen/#paper3

M. K. Shen